Home Up Contents Search Links Credits

 

Chapter II
Chapter II Chapter III Chapter IV Chapter V Chapter VI

 

 

Home
Up

 

Chapter Two                                                            25.03.2003

 

 “CALL THE POLICE…. I’VE BEEN FRAMED”

 

Following on from the first segment of my tales of daring do’s, I am beginning to get into this “ note it all down “ lark although I am somewhat unsure as to IS ANYBODY OUT THERE ?. Therefore your comments would be greatly received …..but , don’t forget that I am not doing this as a business, but more as a hobby than any thing else. So keep your really acidic comments to yourselves , or the CAT Gets it!!

 In fact , if we do not receive any comments we might just have to rename the project 666 Fant rather than Fant 888, as I believe that this might appeal to a wider, more liberal, even more inquisitive type of audience………………….

 

We left off at the section where I was thanking my mate “Bones” for all the welding of the frame. This took the form of arc and gas welding : the main frame tubes being 2.2 and 3.0 mm thick mild steel allowed for arc to be used, whereas, the sub frame and holding electrical brackets were all gas welded. From the photographs below you can see the actual modification needed to the frame. These photographs also show the cardboard cut out , as per a true Blue Peter fan ,  shaped cylinder head as per the 888 engine 

Click for higher resolution

Click for higher resolution

Click for higher resolution

Remember to Click on any picture for a higher resolution image

  

 Thankfully we ran out of washing up bottles!!.

The next set of photos show Bones in a good light , namely an arc light , as he suffers from the “Good from afar syndrome!” It is just unfortunate that up close he is “Far from good !”

Items 

Click for higher resolution

Click for higher resolution

Click for higher resolution

 

 In this photo you can see the benefits of taking the swinging arm off prior to welding , you can also see the aluminum cradle that bolts to the back of the engine.

The Italsport 916 special, as shown on this sites homepage, is the bike that I have been referring to in a somewhat envious way, in chapter 1.  And as you can see there are significant differences between both our projects. Namely the use of the original engine mounting holes and the bottom frame loop, and that is without mentioning the very trick forks and wheels etc. On the Italsport 916, the engine seems to be tipped forward and down and this means different /extended engine mounts, it also does not utilise the aluminum frame running from the headstock to the swinging arm. This in turn, dictates the use of different foot pegs, controls and levers not to mention their overall actual positioning, as well as the aluminum skid plate or bash plate .

 

 

 

Whereas the 888 'Fant that is being reported on and built here, will utilise the full frame and all standard bodywork albeit with some changes and alterations. In addition to these differences, and perhaps most important of all ,the Italsport 916 actually works, and has been photographed in anger, whereas mine has only been photographed in a garage!!

 It is probably best to say that the Italsport bike has more in `tune` with the Multistrada i.e. dual purpose, quick handling, mainly road biased and a potentially very rapid motorbike. As opposed to my slightly different route of utilisation of original parts and styling, moreover, the Italsport will undoubtedly be more sports orientated that the 888 Fant will ever be. However, I am happy to say that I get more of a thrill out of the KTM Adventurer than the new Multistada but as they say…. “Different Horses for Different Courses” or should that be …. “Different 'Fants for Different Rants”……………….anyway, back to the story,

 

The 888 engine was taken out of the frame again, bearing in mind that the swinging arm bushes had yet to be machined down. As mentioned before the swinging arm bushes are cast into the 888 engines as indeed they are with all Ducati engines other than those supplied to Cagiva. This is shown in photos H & I where you can compare the swinging arm bush detail.

The 888 engine therefore had to be machined down, and it was agreed to do this with a mini-grinder, various cutting and sanding discs and a machined spindle of different lengths, to show the correct finished width of the engine.

 

For those of you who don’t know, and I apologise to those who do, the 'Fant engine bolts to the frame via an aluminum cradle plate each side of the engine. This cradle carries the bottom suspension pivot point under the engine and all engine mounting rear bolts pass through this aluminum cradle. Therefore whatever machining that has to be carried out is masked or hidden by the cradle. To this end, as long as the grinding of the bushes was level, square, and at the right depth, the actual witness marks would be hidden. The machined spindle would act as a guide when grinding commenced and being mild steel would “feel different” once reached with the grinder.

 It was with immense caution that I tightened the cutting disc into the mini grinder and in slow motion , went through my checks and double checks. Someone once said to me, back in my apprentice engineering days, “Measure twice ….cut once”. That must have been approx 25 years ago when I was 17or18 years of age, because now, at this moment in the garage, all I could think about was “measure again… don’t cut”. Finally, the first grinding incision was made on the right hand side of the engine, the cutting through the aluminium was kind of straight forward, but as soon as the disc hit the needle rollers, smoke, resistance and fear all leap upwards, and my grip tightened accordingly and I was beginning to wish that I gave this job to someone else .

 Once the cage roller was destroyed the grinder carried on through the rest of the aluminium casing. When finished, I tapped out the roller bearing debris and changed to sanding/lap wheel on the mini grinder. The casting was sanded down and then applying engineering blue I could identify the uneven sections, before re grinding into a square, level section for the cradle to rest and butt up against.

 

This photograph Click for higher resolution, shows the rough/uneven finish achieved with the cutting disc. Approx 2-3mm of material still had to be ground back at this stage.

 

Photograph K, shows the finished item, which is square, level and smooth.  

 

K

 

The next two photographs L&M,

L M

Click for higher resolution

Click for higher resolution

show the engine and cradle, finally measuring the correct dimensions and ready to be framed. It was just a matter of continually grinding and re measuring until the cradle size was correct. As mentioned before, the 888 engine into this frame is not an easy fitting exercise and this was compounded by the problems encountered with the closeness of the rear head inspection cover to the left hand rear frame tube. But, undaunted, we progress, carry on, and try to keep to the initial criteria by grinding more of the frame away, in order to established the right fit. With the engine out, it was time to clean, weld, clean and re-weld the frame prior to painting the frame. Also the end caps and bracing plates could be added , welded and reground until they looked right.

 Rather than going the stove enameling route I had decided to keep the standard silver frame finish and use the latest generation of 2-pack paint. A local auto spraying company sold ready mixed 2-pack in spray cans with a shelf life of 5 days, which necessitated getting the paint mixed and ‘canned’ when we were ready to spray. Over the course of a ten-day period, the frame was regularly cleaned, sprayed and lacquered until the desired effect was achieved. During this phase, the middle engine mounts were re-positioned by this I mean the auminium struts that run from the bottom top frame tube down into the ‘V’ of the engine. The struts had to be moved due to the actual size of the heads on the 888, the heads are simply too big to allow the original M10 welded bosses to be utilised ,refer to photo N .  

N

 The other frame modification involved the rear sub frame top lugs. Due to the repositioning of the rear engine tubes, the sub frame had to shortened accordingly and the old lugs repositioned in order to compensate the photograph O,

 

O

 

 shows the “new” rear engine tube with the repositioned top rear sub frame lugs welded back in place. This photo also shows the now redundant middle mounting bracket boss for the original engine mount.

 

The rear sub frame bottom or lower lugs were left in the same position, and all that was required was to weld the new lugs onto the now shortened top arms of the sub frame, positioned, and then tacked in place. The photographs P & Q,

P Q
Click for higher resolution Click for higher resolution

show the lugs prior to being re-welded and the incision on the sub frame assembly. In photo Q1

Q1

Click for higher resolution

 this is  a more completed shot, but identifies the two cuts made in the upper tube of the rear sub frame, just in line with the battery box position. The rear sub frame was shortened by the same dimension as that of the new rear engine tube-: approx 30mm. With all this in place, the priming of the metal could take place, prior to the base coat and topcoats. The “only” other modification was “where to bolt the middle engine struts to?”

 

So, again, the mini grinder made an appearance,Photo R

 

R

, and the now shortened aluminum struts were positioned in a more, directly, vertical route. The area where they crossed the down tube was drilled and re-enforced by a section of 25 x 25 x 3mm mild steel angle iron. This sound appalling, but in real terms, actually strengthens the bottom tube and eliminates the possibility of the frame tube collapsing under the squeezing of the bolt from which the strut hangs. Its actually easier to look at Photograph S, the 25 x 25 angle is approx 75mm long with a 8mm clearance hole through it the bolt is a stainless steel type a nylon nut is utilised.

   

 

S

 

I pondered long and hard over additional bracing and extra struts, but after viewing the actual Ducati 900 P.D. bike on the web , try ; http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/siccobi/motore/img/pag18-19.jpg

 I decided it wasn’t necessary, and seemed overkill. The P.D. race winner only had one rear and one middle frame to engine mount. My 888 would three mounts plus the additional strength of the 'Fant swinging arm system rather than the Ducati non-framed swinging arm system. The 900P.D engine was used totally as a stressed member. If these 900 P.D. bikes can compete and win under Desert race conditions with that frame arrangement then who am I to question additional bracing. I mean lets face facts, I am more likely to be experiencing  severe dessert conditions rather than desert ones !

 

However, I did succumb to a token gesture of an extra brace as shown in Photo T.  

 

T

Back to the 'Fant, with the engine in place and the sub frame now sorted, the bottom loop of the frame i.e. the aluminium section that holds the pegs and brake assembly not to mention the oil coolers, could be refitted. It bolted back in place with no alterations,…..amazing…simply amazing… well not quite.

 

A spacer had to be placed under the top mounting bolt, just to “kick” out the tube slightly, and the tube had to be relieved at the point, where tube crossed the cam cover. Oh, and the middle section joining the two loops together had to be cut out. Photo R as shown before. This now made the bottom loops, two independent sections rather than one, but this could be re-addressed later. The middle section once cut out was then kept for something else, something which actually looks like it was designed for… the water radiator-mounting bracket.

Photograph U please relieve the situation!!

 

 

U

The tube nearly touches the cam cover, this was taken care of by use of the now trusted sander.  

Photo V shows the original bottom front engine support. 

 

V

 

This section used to bridge the bottom aluminium loops, that was before it was made redundant, cut up and re-deployed as the radiator mounting bracket, it actually looks the part, don’t worry the over long bolt is just a temporary measure.

 Photo W shows all that is wasted of the frame after the alterations. 

 

W

 

These two sections of 30 x 30 x 3mm Ali, are all that is left over. Every other section of the frame has been utilised to support the ‘new’ 888 engine. No wastage….. just total utilisation of existing components.

 Next stop the injection system.

 As I write this on the   27th  of  March the bike is now at Pete Gibson of Gibson exhausts, Romford, having the system, as was, on the  Lucky modified to fit the 888. See photo X.

 

X

 

 This system was well proven on the 944 Lucky over a 5000km period and will act as a good comparison for the 888. At least we know that this system works!! Moreover, it has the benefit of being extremely light in weight, being stainless headers and titanium end can. You might also just be able to spot the tapered headers just before the exhaust ports and the colour of  the can. This is not a “cosmetic finish” the exhaust regularly resembled a blowtorch when the bike was ridden hard, with flames coming out the back of the end can!! The test bed 944 Lucky went back to standard headers mated to a REMUS end can . At least it keeps the neighbours slightly happier, and doesn’t melt the number plate!!

 

 

Just as a little taster……take a look at photo Y  and Y1 here is a side by side shot of the two bikes …… subtle …..or what !

 

 

 

Y

Y1

 

In Glasgow, when I was growing up in the 1960’s there wasn’t a lot of money around. Therefore on the estate where I lived certain cash advances were made to tenants and the weekly installments collected accordingly by debt collectors. These advances were made in general by the Provident Company often shortened by us youngsters to the “Provy” and their collectors became the “men from the Provy” hence the analogy of the last instalment , it has nothing to do with the men from the Provos, they used to collect something entirely different!!

 

PS. 888 into 900 will go!!

 

Lead on McDuff

 

Next month: The injection system and the problems with chips , and the first real mistake with all the work done up to now…how will I cope??

Stay tuned ………………………………………………………………

 

 

Send mail to Paul@elefantriders.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2002-2005 Paul Kristensen
Last modified: 07/02/06